Tuesday, 26 March 2019

JESUS MURDERS A CARING LARGE PERSON




Not Josef but he's gone.


What is it with Christians and their ridiculous belief in a mythical person who/which is supposed to be kind and loving but in most of the fairy tales built up around him/her/it seems to be a vengeful and cruel psychopath?

In The Old Testament God is particularly violent. There are many instances where he/she/it requires the death penalty. Among the 'crimes' are sacrificing to a god other than Yahweh (Exodus 22:20), persistent rebelliousness on the part of a child (Deuteronomy 21:18–21), a child who hits or curses his or her parents (Exodus 21:15 and 17), working on the Sabbath (Exodus 35:2), premarital sexual intercourse (Deuteronomy 22:13–21), and the requirement for a priest to burn his daughter alive if she became a prostitute (Leviticus 21:9). It's a bit blood thirsty to be honest.

When God isn't demanding the death penalty he/she/it is often seen indulging in a bit of anger and wrath. with the punishment given out seeming to be particularly harsh, unjust, and disproportionate.
In 2 Samuel 24 King David decided to take a census of the men of fighting age. The prophet Gad was sent to David to announce God’s displeasure with the taking of the census. The punishment for David’s sin: “The Lord sent a pestilence on Israel from that morning until the appointed time; and seventy thousand of the people died” (2 Samuel 24:15). David made a decision that does not please God, and God kills 70,000 Israelites for it? How could this action ever be reconciled with a God of mercy, compassion, justice, and love?

There are plenty more examples of this nutter's overreaction but I'll leave it to you to find them.


***************

The subject of this post is of Jesus of The New Testament fame.

I'm sure that you remember this story from your childhood:









The Selfish Giant -  Oscar Wilde

Every afternoon, as they were coming from school, the children used to go and play in the Giant’s garden. It was a large lovely garden, with soft green grass. Here and there over the grass stood beautiful flowers like stars, and there were twelve peach-trees that in the spring-time broke out into delicate blossoms of pink and pearl, and in the autumn bore rich fruit. The birds sat on the trees and sang so sweetly that the children used to stop their games in order to listen to them. “How happy we are here!” they cried to each other. One day the Giant came back. He had been to visit his friend the Cornish ogre, and had stayed with him for seven years. After the seven years were over he had said all that he had to say, for his conversation was limited, and he determined to return to his own castle. When he arrived he saw the children playing in the garden. “What are you doing here?” he cried in a very gruff voice, and the children ran away. “My own garden is my own garden,” said the Giant; “any one can understand that, and I will allow nobody to play in it but myself.” So he built a high wall all round it, and put up a notice-board. TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSECUTED He was a very selfish Giant. The poor children had now nowhere to play. They tried to play on the road, but the road was very dusty and full of hard stones, and they did not like it. They used to wander round the high wall when their lessons were over, and talk about the beautiful garden inside. “How happy we were there,” they said to each other. Then the Spring came, and all over the country there were little blossoms and little birds. Only in the garden of the Selfish Giant it was still winter. The birds did not care to sing in it as there were no children, and the trees forgot to blossom. Once a beautiful flower put its head out from the grass, but when it saw the notice-board it was so sorry for the children that it slipped back into the ground again, and went off to sleep. The only people who were pleased were the Snow and the Frost. “Spring has forgotten this garden,” they cried, “so we will live here all the year round.” The Snow covered up the grass with her great white cloak, and the Frost painted all the trees silver. Then they invited the North Wind to stay with them, and he came. He was wrapped in furs, and he roared all day about the garden, and blew the chimney-pots down. “This is a delightful spot,” he said, “we must ask the Hail on a visit.” So the Hail came. Every day for three hours he rattled on the roof of the castle till he broke most of the slates, and then he ran round and round the garden as fast as he could go. He was dressed in grey, and his breath was like ice. “I cannot understand why the Spring is so late in coming,” said the Selfish Giant, as he sat at the window and looked out at his cold white garden; “I hope there will be a change in the weather.” But the Spring never came, nor the Summer. The Autumn gave golden fruit to every garden, but to the Giant’s garden she gave none. “He is too selfish,” she said. So it was always Winter there, and the North Wind, and the Hail, and the Frost, and the Snow danced about through the trees. One morning the Giant was lying awake in bed when he heard some lovely music. It sounded so sweet to his ears that he thought it must be the King’s musicians passing by. It was really only a little linnet singing outside his window, but it was so long since he had heard a bird sing in his garden that it seemed to him to be the most beautiful music in the world. Then the Hail stopped dancing over his head, and the North Wind ceased roaring, and a delicious perfume came to him through the open casement. “I believe the Spring has come at last,” said the Giant; and he jumped out of bed and looked out. What did he see? He saw a most wonderful sight. Through a little hole in the wall the children had crept in, and they were sitting in the branches of the trees. In every tree that he could see there was a little child. And the trees were so glad to have the children back again that they had covered themselves with blossoms, and were waving their arms gently above the children’s heads. The birds were flying about and twittering with delight, and the flowers were looking up through the green grass and laughing. It was a lovely scene, only in one corner it was still winter. It was the farthest corner of the garden, and in it was standing a little boy. He was so small that he could not reach up to the branches of the tree, and he was wandering all round it, crying bitterly. The poor tree was still quite covered with frost and snow, and the North Wind was blowing and roaring above it. “Climb up! little boy,” said the Tree, and it bent its branches down as low as it could; but the boy was too tiny. And the Giant’s heart melted as he looked out. “How selfish I have been!” he said; “now I know why the Spring would not come here. I will put that poor little boy on the top of the tree, and then I will knock down the wall, and my garden shall be the children’s playground for ever and ever.” He was really very sorry for what he had done. So he crept downstairs and opened the front door quite softly, and went out into the garden. But when the children saw him they were so frightened that they all ran away, and the garden became winter again. Only the little boy did not run, for his eyes were so full of tears that he did not see the Giant coming. And the Giant stole up behind him and took him gently in his hand, and put him up into the tree. And the tree broke at once into blossom, and the birds came and sang on it, and the little boy stretched out his two arms and flung them round the Giant’s neck, and kissed him. And the other children, when they saw that the Giant was not wicked any longer, came running back, and with them came the Spring. “It is your garden now, little children,” said the Giant, and he took a great axe and knocked down the wall. And when the people were going to market at twelve o’clock they found the Giant playing with the children in the most beautiful garden they had ever seen. All day long they played, and in the evening they came to the Giant to bid him good-bye. “But where is your little companion?” he said: “the boy I put into the tree.” The Giant loved him the best because he had kissed him. “We don’t know,” answered the children; “he has gone away.” “You must tell him to be sure and come here to-morrow,” said the Giant. But the children said that they did not know where he lived, and had never seen him before; and the Giant felt very sad. Every afternoon, when school was over, the children came and played with the Giant. But the little boy whom the Giant loved was never seen again. The Giant was very kind to all the children, yet he longed for his first little friend, and often spoke of him. “How I would like to see him!” he used to say. Years went over, and the Giant grew very old and feeble. He could not play about any more, so he sat in a huge armchair, and watched the children at their games, and admired his garden. “I have many beautiful flowers,” he said; “but the children are the most beautiful flowers of all.” One winter morning he looked out of his window as he was dressing. He did not hate the Winter now, for he knew that it was merely the Spring asleep, and that the flowers were resting. Suddenly he rubbed his eyes in wonder, and looked and looked. It certainly was a marvellous sight. In the farthest corner of the garden was a tree quite covered with lovely white blossoms. Its branches were all golden, and silver fruit hung down from them, and underneath it stood the little boy he had loved. Downstairs ran the Giant in great joy, and out into the garden. He hastened across the grass, and came near to the child. And when he came quite close his face grew red with anger, and he said, “Who hath dared to wound thee?” For on the palms of the child’s hands were the prints of two nails, and the prints of two nails were on the little feet. “Who hath dared to wound thee?” cried the Giant; “tell me, that I may take my big sword and slay him.” “Nay!” answered the child; “but these are the wounds of Love.” “Who art thou?” said the Giant, and a strange awe fell on him, and he knelt before the little child. And the child smiled on the Giant, and said to him, “You let me play once in your garden, to-day you shall come with me to my garden, which is Paradise.” And when the children ran in that afternoon, they found the Giant lying dead under the tree, all covered with white blossoms.


****************

The little boy that the giant took a liking to was of course Jesus. So far so good but then this Jesus joker decided to reward the giant's kindness by knocking the poor bastard off. How unfair's that?





Saturday, 16 February 2019

THE CATHOLIC APOLOGIST






So Robert has now become a catholic 'apologist'.

See: HERE

No doubt he means a catholic apologetic but let's not get in between Robert and common sense or good grammar.

I decided to go to that font of all knowledge - the internet and found:


Askacatholic.com

In Askacatholic.com I found a stream where the difference between apologetics and apologies is explained by some guy named Mike.

Hi Carmen,

Catholic Apologetics is the science of explaining the Catholic Faith in a rational and reasonable manner with love and patience.
The term Apologetics comes from the Greek word, apologia (απολογία), meaning:
a speaking in defense of a teaching, or
a presentation or defense for what one believes.
Many are confused by this word because in common English language it implies or suggests something different:

An apology is a justifiable or unjustifiable excuse for doing something wrong.
This different definition is not being used here. Good Catholics are never sorry for being Catholic, rather they feel blessed to be Catholic.
In the Catholic Church, the word apology takes on a secondary meaning:

the science of explaining the Catholic Faith in a rational and reasonable manner with love and patience.
Examples you will see:
The Apology of Justin Martyr.
Here St. Justin Martyr is giving his defense of the Catholic faith on a certain topic in the form of a talk or speech.
Note in both definitions whether:
one is referring to an apology in the sense of apologizing for something they did wrong or
in the sense of giving a [talk/speech] in defense of what one believes
one is giving reasons or a defense in both definitions.
Hope this helps,
Mike

No doubt I'll be able to contact Mike in the future when I need to interpret what Robert is saying in his new 'apologetic' role.
If the past is anything to go by though I suspect it'll be a lot of 'same old' with Robert banging on about the holy ghost, mass, Richard's sinning and how I and others who were educated by nuns, brothers, paedophiles and priests should be embracing the good news about the catechism and sharing it with others.



If we can revisit that explanation by Mike, above though we can see a few holes in it:

"Catholic Apologetics is the science of explaining the Catholic Faith in a rational and reasonable manner" Really? Do I really need to critique this? It seems to be self-evident in its nonsense.

"An apology is a justifiable or unjustifiable excuse for doing something wrong." - Well yes, and this is an argument for saying that Robert may be right in calling himself an apologist rather than an apologetic.

"Good Catholics are never sorry for being Catholic, rather they feel blessed to be Catholic." - a possible definition of arrogance.



Sunday, 20 January 2019

THE COLOURS OF SIN


The Curmudgeon asked what colour mortal sin was when he commented on Robert's blog recently.

It's an interesting question that doesn't seem to have an answer.
Most people I guess would surmise that it is black as sin is often described in this way but internet searches haven't been definitive.

It's dark so must be a mortal sin.

The so-called Seven Deadly Sins are associated with colour and these have found their way into our sayings and culture:

Pride: violet
Envy: green
Wrath: orange
Sloth: light blue
Greed: yellow
Gluttony: pink
Lust: red 
There's no mention of the colours of Mortal Sin and Venial Sin though.

If Mortal sin is black then Venial sin might be grey. What colour then is Grace? Is it pure white?

Robert being a performing practicing catholic might know. He has the added advantage of being a professional cleaner so no doubt has all sorts of chemicals that can scrub up his graces and could even, with rubbing, turn a Mortal sin into a Venial sin.

Oh the vagaries, intricacies and mysteries of the catholic church.

No wonder everyone is so interested in it.






Sunday, 13 January 2019

JESUS IS MY FRIEND




I know that Robert is always looking for music to listen to while he's vacuuming walls and looking through client's underwear drawers. Here's an inspirational song that will warm the cockles of his heart:






It's a catchy little number that catholics of all sorts will like.






The thing about catholicism as the name suggests is that it's wide-ranging and can accommodate all sorts of people:

CATHOLIC
adjective
~ including a wide variety of things; all-embracing.
"her tastes are pretty catholic"
synonyms: diverse, diversified, wide, broad, broad-based, eclectic, indiscriminate.
So even goths and death metallists have a place in Robert's heaven.


Wednesday, 5 December 2018

SATAN'S ALLEY






I've found a Christmas movie for Robert, knowing that he likes religious stuff, particularly Catholic stuff.

Richard, that Catholic church condemnor who doth condemn too much should appreciate this as well.

Here's a trailer for the film that gives a fair idea of what it is about.






Critics rave about this:
" It made me even harder than my name suggests" -  Allan Woodcock - St Patrick's College Silverstream

" Gave me a nice tingling sensation 'down there'"  - Peter Hercock - Sacred Heart Intermediate Nelson

" I could do with some more of this" - Brother Randy Hitchcock - Marist Brother's Moera.

" Takes me back, way back - I like it" - Father Dick Cockburn - Saint Onan's Parish Wainuiomata


Tuesday, 4 December 2018

MAKING ASSUMPTIONS (AND ASCENSIONS)






Mary, in the left panel can clearly be seen to being dragged up into heaven (The Assumption) while Jesus in the right panel is clearly free spiriting his way up there (The Ascension).



As I said in my previous post I want to try to give Robert a fair chance to explain his various religious beliefs without my coming across as being too dismissive or judgemental. In the post KARL, JOHN AND ME I agreed with Robert that churches have good qualities and can be beneficial to the wellbeing of churchgoers. Robert's response was:

" "I believe in churches and religions being havens for people who are busy, sad, tired, stressed, unwell and needing some affirmation and support."
So no one goes to church to joyfully worship a supreme spiritual being that created the universe and all the other realms we have never heard of?"
So, the approach wasn't exactly a success.

Nevermind, I think that I'll keep going, again without being dismissive and judgemental and, like Richard (of RBB) try to be open minded.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church has articles of faith that catholics must abide by. Now I've probably got this all wrong - Christian Doctrine for me, at Intermediate and Secondary schools was my worst subject and one that I regularly failed. I would get A pluses in the sciences and languages but D minuses in Christian Doctrine. I should have, instead of trying to remember and regurgitate the nonsense (stop being dismissive and judgemental - Ed.), just made up some 'articles of faith' myself. I couldn't I'm sure have been any more wacky.


ARTICLE 6
"HE ASCENDED INTO HEAVEN AND IS SEATED AT THE RIGHT HAND OF THE FATHER"
662 "And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself." The lifting up of Jesus on the cross signifies and announces his lifting up by his Ascension into heaven, and indeed begins it. Jesus Christ, the one priest of the new and eternal Covenant, "entered, not into a sanctuary made by human hands. . . but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf.
ARTICLE 9
"SHE WAS TAKEN UP BODY AND SOUL INTO THE GLORY OF HEAVEN"

966 "Finally the Immaculate Virgin, preserved free from all stain of original sin, when the course of her earthly life was finished, was taken up body and soul into heavenly glory, and exalted by the Lord as Queen over all things, so that she might be the more fully conformed to her Son, the Lord of lords and conqueror of sin and death."

OK then. The Catholics believe, by mandate, that both Jesus and Mary went 'up to heaven' in both body and soul. Robert, as a reborn catholic must then believe this. Fair enough. He's a mature and grown man. He can believe whatever he wants to believe. What I want to know then is what is his reading of this.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that these people, who history seems to prove existed, somehow went up to heaven. This raises some questions:

What is heaven?
Why is it up?
If these people went up body and soul, why didn't gravity bring them down again?
What kind of propulsion was involved?


I believe that I'm not being dismissive and judgemental in asking these questions.

I'm hoping that Robert can provide some insights.

Tuesday, 6 November 2018

KARL, JOHN AND ME




I must admit that I've given Robert a bit of stick over the last few years over his religious beliefs.
Admittedly they're a bit whacky and may have been the result of breathing in the fumes from those cleaning agents he uses at work. There's no other way to explain it since he had a very similar education at the same school that Richard and I also went to and he completed a degree at Victoria university so the guy's not stupid - just maybe misguided.

Recently though he started up another blog (he continually deletes all his blog posts and occasionally the entire blog and has to start again) titled  Life In The Spirit.  LIFE IN THE SPIRIT


Now I'm not saying that this isn't wacky and will no doubt dive down into diatribes about god, sin, heaven, hell, Satan and creationism but at present it seems to be on an even keel.

In one post where he recounted going to Confession which is a ridiculous construct purported to be a 'sacrament' he came away feeling elated and happy -

"I was totally forgiven for all my infidelities and that I just had to pray for the success of my current marriage. I did that and joy of joys I feel great."

I'm pleased for him and it underscores my belief that there is a place in the world for religions if they just concentrate on making people feel good instead of preying on their fears and insecurities.

I don't necessarily believe in the Marxist theory that 'Religion is the opiate of the people' - the full quote from Karl Marx translates as:

"Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people"

Nor do I entirely subscribe to John Lennon's view in his song Working Class Hero -

"Keep you doped with religion and sex and TV. And you think you're so clever and classless and free. But you're still fucking peasants as far as I can see. A working class hero is something to be".

I believe in churches and religions being havens for people who are busy, sad, tired,  stressed, unwell and needing some affirmation and support. It's no coincidence that the older churches had architecture that aided this. Unfortunately some of the modern constructs are plain, soulless and deeply unsatisfying.

No wonder that Robert liked the photograph Richard took of a Roman church.



QUE SIRA, SIRA

I've been quiet for a while, being mildly amused at Robert's almost daily publishing of scripture that no doubt has been fed to him ...